top of page
Editorial illustration of a football crossing a gold scoring plane with an illuminated purple-and-gold drive trail

LSU Scored on 11 of 17 Sam Leavitt Drives—The Efficiency Behind the Surge

9 hours ago
4 min read

LSU’s last two wins were not built on one hot quarter or a pile of empty yards. The offense kept finishing possessions. With Sam Leavitt at quarterback, the Tigers scored on 11 of 17 drives against Mississippi State and Auburn—a two-game rate that changes what November can look like.

Quick Answer

LSU scored on 11 of 17 Sam Leavitt-led possessions across the October 17 win over Mississippi State and the October 24 win at Auburn. That is a 64.7 percent scoring rate. Leavitt also completed 63 of 83 passes for 676 yards, seven touchdowns and no interceptions in the two games, giving LSU both drive production and ball security before Alabama.

What 11 scoring possessions in 17 drives means

LSU’s official weekly-awards release states that the offense scored on 11 of 17 Leavitt-led possessions across the Mississippi State and Auburn games. Eleven divided by 17 is 64.7 percent.

That rate is the clearest measure of LSU’s offensive change because drives include everything: starting field position, early-down decisions, third-down conversions, red-zone execution and the ability to avoid turnovers. Yardage can accumulate without points. Completion totals can rise in a losing game. Scoring on nearly two-thirds of possessions means the production repeatedly reached the scoreboard.

TigerHype’s Sam Leavitt–Joe Burrow record analysis explains the quarterback’s consecutive 30-completion games. The drive rate adds the team context: Leavitt’s volume did not merely keep the offense moving; it ended in points often enough to control both games.

Why the two-game sample is more useful than one explosion

One offensive eruption can come from a short field, a busted coverage or an opponent chasing the game. LSU’s 11-of-17 run crossed two defenses and two different settings. Mississippi State came to Baton Rouge ranked No. 16. Auburn brought an SEC road environment and briefly pulled within 17-10.

LSU answered both challenges without becoming reckless. Leavitt threw seven touchdown passes across the two games and no interceptions on 83 attempts. He also added a rushing touchdown at Auburn. The offense found points through sustained accuracy, explosive throws and a quarterback run near the goal line.

At Auburn, the 31-point first-half script showed how quickly the rhythm could overwhelm an opponent. The 11-of-17 figure matters because it reaches beyond that half and measures the broader two-game pattern.

What made LSU’s possessions more efficient

The offense has reduced the number of snaps that kill a series. Leavitt is taking available completions before asking receivers to win downfield. Protection has held long enough for the route structure to develop. When defenses tighten, LSU has found explosive answers instead of forcing the ball into crowded windows.

Efficiency also depends on sequencing. A short completion on first down may look ordinary, but it keeps the full call sheet available. A defense that begins squeezing those throws becomes vulnerable to a vertical route or play-action shot. LSU’s best possessions have made the defense wrong in stages rather than hunting one perfect call.

Ball security is the final layer. Zero interceptions across the two games meant LSU did not hand either opponent a short field or erase a promising drive with one decision. Against Alabama, that restraint will be essential because the Crimson Tide has turned five interceptions into touchdowns this season.

Why Alabama makes 64.7 percent hard to repeat

LSU should not expect to score on nearly two-thirds of its possessions on November 7. Alabama’s defense forced Texas A&M into three-and-outs on every fourth-quarter possession and has created 19 takeaways through eight games. The margin for a stalled protection, a late throw or a missed red-zone assignment will be smaller.

That pressure is why LSU’s four-punt defensive response at Auburn belongs in the same conversation. If the offense’s scoring rate falls against Alabama, the defense must keep returning possessions. Complementary football can preserve LSU’s patience when the next points take longer to arrive.

The open-date standard for LSU’s offense

The goal during the open date is not to chase 11-of-17 as a magic number. It is to preserve the habits underneath it: manageable downs, clean protection communication, decisive distribution, explosive answers when coverage compresses and no free possessions for the opponent.

LSU has found a version of its offense that produces points without gambling every drive. The Alabama test is whether that efficiency can survive longer third downs, tighter red-zone windows and a defense waiting to turn one impatient throw into six points the other way.

LSU offensive efficiency FAQ

How often did LSU score on Sam Leavitt-led possessions against Mississippi State and Auburn?

LSU scored on 11 of 17 possessions led by Sam Leavitt across the two games, a 64.7 percent scoring rate.

How many touchdowns did Sam Leavitt account for in those two games?

Leavitt threw seven touchdown passes and added one rushing touchdown across the wins over Mississippi State and Auburn.

Did Sam Leavitt throw an interception in either game?

No. Leavitt threw no interceptions across 83 pass attempts in the two-game stretch.

When does LSU play Alabama?

LSU hosts Alabama on Saturday, November 7, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. CT on ABC.

Tiger fans: which matters more against Alabama—preserving LSU’s passing efficiency or creating a stronger run-pass balance to shorten the game?

Comments


purple-ghost-tiger-stripes.png
win-bar-transparent.png

EARLY HOLIDAY SALE

Give a little victory.

$̶7̶5̶   $65   SAVE $10

Handcrafted by TigerHype

FREE SHIPPING

Continental U.S. · WIN Bar-only orders

Ends Nov 15

tigerhype tiger 1
  • Youtube
  • X
  • alt.text.label.Facebook
  • alt.text.label.LinkedIn
  • alt.text.label.Instagram

©2023 by TigerHype

tigerhype tiger logo

TigerHype.com is an independent website featuring LSU sports, news & opinions. This website is neither affiliated with, nor endorsed by Louisiana State University or its athletic department. The opinions expressed on this site are not necessarily those of TigerHype.com or its operators.

bottom of page